What does online discussion tell us about the psychology of conspiracy theories?

This study has recently been linked to as a demonstration that people who believe 9/11 conspiracy theories are “more sane” than people who don’t. The study has no bearing on mental health, and this claim about “sanity” relies on wishful misinterpretation of the results. Please see this post and this follow-up for more information.

I’ve just had a new paper published in Frontiers in Psychology along with Karen Douglas, my co-author and PhD supervisor. Frontiers is an open-access journal, meaning that anyone can read the full text for free, so if you’re interested go ahead and check it out.

“What about Building 7?” A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories

In this study we diverged a bit from our usual questionnaire-based methods. Instead we collected over 2000 comments from online news stories about 9/11 – the ones that tried to persuade people one way or another regarding whether the attacks were the result of a government conspiracy. We then coded each comment on a variety of variables – how hostile it was on a scale of 1 to 5, whether it mentioned other conspiracy theories positively or negatively, and most importantly how it made its argument. This last subject was what we were most interested in, and it gave us the most interesting result of the paper.

Let’s say you’re trying to convince me that 9/11 was an inside job – you have a couple of ways of going about this. First, you could try to argue that the official story is inadequate: “jet fuel can’t melt steel,” “the hole in the Pentagon couldn’t have been made by a passenger jet,” and so on. You could also argue that the conspiracy theories provide a better account: “thermite residue was found in the WTC,” “surveillance footage clearly shows a cruise missile hitting the Pentagon,” etc. If I’m trying to convince you that 9/11 was done by Al-Qaeda terrorists, I have the same two options – I could try to argue that the other interpretation is wrong (“the conspiracy would have to be implausibly huge to pull this off,” “there were no explosion sounds from the bombs going off in the towers”) or I could directly argue that my interpretation is correct (“jet fuel is hot enough to compromise the integrity of structural steel,” “witnesses saw a plane hit the Pentagon”).

In this study we found that conspiracist comments were much more likely to argue against the official account than in favour of their own interpretation. Conversely, conventionalist (anti-conspiracist) comments were more likely to argue in favour of their own interpretation than against the conspiracy theories. This result agrees with our theory that belief in conspiracy theories can be more accurately characterised as a disbelief in official or received explanations – that the content of the conspiracy theory doesn’t matter as much as the fact that it opposes whatever the official explanation is. The focus is not on promoting an alternative explanation, but in debunking the official story.

We found some other interesting things as well – check out the paper if you’re interested. It was a very interesting project and I’m glad it turned out so well, but coding thousands of news website comments is extremely labour-intensive, certainly more so than questionnaire data entry. Regardless, there’s a great deal of data out the in the form of what people write online, and we can learn a lot from analysing it.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to What does online discussion tell us about the psychology of conspiracy theories?

  1. I followed the link to the paper and found but a paragraph on frontiers. http://www.frontiersin.org/personality_science_and_individual_differences/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00409/abstract Is the a link to the paper or is this abstract all that is available? Thanks! ….. john

  2. Mike Wood says:

    Hi John – the link to the full text and PDF is on the right sidebar, under “Article Info”.

  3. flyingtigercomics says:

    Do you consider the documented proof of the many times that an official explanation is a pack of lies?

  4. Pingback: Omnium Gatherum: August 10, 2013 | The Hermetic Library Blog

  5. Pingback: Omnium Gatherum: August 14, 2013 | The Hermetic Library Blog

  6. chevdo says:

    Anyone who has actually spent any significant amount of time partaking in the 9/11 conspiracy debate would already be aware of the conclusions of this study. Of course conspiracy theorists are concerned with attacking the official position rather than promoting conspiracy theories. They know their theories are pretty hokey, most of the time, that’s why they always do the “what about this!” game, whereby they try to pick apart the official story with whatever they can throw at it no matter how ludicrous it is. And no wonder the people arguing with them get frustrated and hostile, since it seems like the conspiracy theorists are constantly ignoring the logical explainations the anti-conspiricists are putting forth, preferring to throw out another theory. The game never changes, the purpose of the conspiracy theorist is to frustrate anyone who dares to volunteer to educate them.

    By the way, for the first few years the 9/11 truthers at least had some cogent arguments but now the facts are all available, and the only thing conspiracy theorists can do is deny the facts. Is it any wonder that those who value reality find them frustrating and react hostilely?

  7. 999 This is a cologne generated for men amongst the ages of 35 and 53, and may be worn in the daytime. I’d personally progress to invest given that feasible chopping it up that has a fellow geek, the while you are not providing whatever.
    louis vuitton sunglasses cheap http://www.play2create.com/louis-vuitton-sunglasses-cheap-c-2.html

  8. Then from there you have some old style of playing that he teaches
    you and of course a couple of really cool soothing worship arrangements, with worship chords.
    For jazz musicians, there are really about twenty jazz standards
    that everyone should know. Most often you do not need a publisher or agent
    to do this and the amounts of money earned if successful enough are in the five-digit banking
    figures.

  9. Make a wish list of cars that you are interested in. You have seen many cars in advertisements and on the road.
    It should be easy for you to build a solid list of vehicles that would
    suit your style. You can add a couple of dream cars that
    seem out of your range; however, be realistic about what you can afford.

    Never take a car at face value. Though you may not be a mechanic, it is
    a good idea to do a thorough inspection of the vehicle. An important part of the inspection is a test drive.
    This allows you to feel the car on the road,
    listen for any wayward noises and possible spot issues with
    performance.

  10. Everything is very open withh a very clear explanation of the issues.

    It was definitely informative. Your website is
    very helpful. Many thanks for sharing!

  11. esponja says:

    Good day! This is my first comment here so I just wanted to give
    a quick shout out and tell you I genuinely enjoy reading your articles.
    Can you recommend any other blogs/websites/forums
    that cover the same topics? Appreciate it!

  12. Was in actual fact shopping for just an average shower enclosures
    before I stumbled upon this web site, did not have any idea there was
    any such thing as a ‘steam shower enclosure’, incredible, may just may have to buy one

  13. The work of creating a responsive website will grab their attention span of Indians is a free and so on. The more
    specific term URL, you can bring your requirements is vital.
    From the menu on your website were a mystery for you.
    This is an element of design. You don’t want to be able to
    realize that there are certain tasks people want
    to have a big project. As a beginner, the meta tags”. But you web design will also be studied in detail.

  14. Thanks for sharing your thoughts on style trends.

    Regards

  15. Emerson says:

    this one is visually similar to my enclosure I bought
    just recently, extremely happy about it for any individual upon the
    fence with regards to buying one, do it, you wont regret it

  16. There are ttwo methods for retrieving the data, an example may be
    reports along with the other is queries. The main findings from the research
    meeting are that this unit of failure should not be aany disk drive;
    rather it mhst be a group oof devices wijth embedded intelligence (i.
    Theey have thee abilitty to locate tthe files but can’t restore them or to their original file directory.

  17. Pingback: Scientific study reveals conspiracy theorists the most sane of all - PaulCraigRoberts.org

  18. Pingback: How to read a study on conspiracies| Day 99 | Signe Cane

Comments are closed.